
2005: Hurricane prediction well below what occurred. 28 named storms, so many the Greek alphabet was used. Storms like Katrina, Rita and Wilma hit the U.S.
2006: Following the massive devastation and loss of life from the '05 season, seasonal forecasters predicted "higher-than-average" activity. It didn't happen.
2007: Same thing. 17 named storms, 9 hurricanes predicted. We had 14 named storms, and 6 hurricanes. Humberto was really the only storm to affect the U.S.
PLEASE don't get me wrong. I couldn't be a seasonal hurricane forecaster, that's why I'm in the broadcasting end of meteorology. I just don't think the "science" is there yet to accurately predict what exactly a hurricane season will be like. Is there value in these forecasts? - YES! But, the public is already questioning the last three "botched" years of hurricane forecasts. Blogs on Tuesday were filled with comments like: "These forecasts are a joke!", "...why do we even have weather reports!?", and my favorite, "The winning numbers for Wednesday's Florida Lottery drawing are: 3-14-28-35-41-50." When the public starts to form an opinion as strongly as this, it'll take a few years of near 100% accuracy to change their minds. Even Max Mayfield, former director of the National Hurricane Center in Miami said, "The seasonal hurricane forecasters certainly have a lot of explaining to do."
Again, don't get me wrong, I have a lot of respect for these folks who dish out these forecasts, but it's like me telling you how much snow we're going to get between now and spring within two-inches. I could guess, but I'd probably be wrong, and you'd probably hold me to my forecast!
Hurricane season ends Friday. Hope your week is going well! --Jay
No comments:
Post a Comment